February 19, 2013

Bill would ease police efforts to keep guns out of irresponsible hands, police say

By Michael Shepherd mshepherd@mainetoday.com
State House Bureau

AUGUSTA — While the Legislature moved Tuesday to shield concealed-weapon permit information from the public, Maine’s law enforcement community says better access to the information could help police get guns out of the hands of criminals.

Law enforcement agencies now have no reliable, real-time way to check on whether people who commit crimes have concealed-weapon permits for which they no longer qualify.

As the Legislature and Gov. Paul LePage moved Tuesday to keep the information private, another bill before the Legislature would create a central database of permit-holders to give law enforcement agencies easier access to the information.

“It’s not uncommon for us to find disqualifying events” when people ask to renew their permits, said Lt. Scott Ireland, head of the Maine State Police’s licensing division, which has about 25,000 active permits out to people in more than 300 rural municipalities and out-of-state. “There’s always room for improvement in the system, and there’s room for improvement here.”

A LePage spokesman said she could not comment on the database bill.

LePage led the effort to keep concealed weapons information private; but he also spoke about domestic violence during his State of the State speech earlier this month, saying “we need to do something about getting guns away from abusers.”

Permit holders must answer questions about criminal history and go through background and mental-health checks to get initial permits and to get them renewed every four years. Permits can be revoked by the issuing authority for reasons ranging from a charge or conviction to a violation of state law’s “good moral character” clause, which could include a history of abuse.

However, police may not know if a person who commits a crime already has a concealed-weapon permit in Maine that should be revoked. That happens for a host of reasons, chief of which is that a central list — or even a reliable number — of permit holders doesn’t exist, police said.

Robert Schwartz, executive director of the Maine Chiefs of Police Association, has said there might be about 45,000 permits in Maine. Ireland has estimated there might be 33,000.

They don’t know because Ireland’s office keeps one tally of state-issued permits and larger municipalities keep track separately of the permits they give out. 

Vern Malloch, Portland’s assistant police chief, said that often, rural departments that keep permit records don’t have 24-hour staffing, so if his officers run into someone in Portland who has a concealed weapon or commits a crime, they might not be able to reach the issuing town or city to check on a pemit.

L.D. 189, sponsored by Rep. Timothy Marks, D-Pittston, would establish a statewide database of permit-holders so law enforcement, courts and correctional officers could track permits. Ireland, Schwartz and Malloch all endorsed the idea.

“I think the process could be improved,” said William Harwood, a Portland attorney who founded Mainers Against Handgun Violence. “There should be a process by which by enforcement routinely check the criminal background check database against the concealed-weapons database to see if there’s a permit that needs to be revoked.”

Ireland has said his four-person office staff is struggling with more than a three-month backlog of permit applications because of increased demand. The office is technically in violation of state law, which says permits for most Mainers should be issued within 30 days.

Along with the lack of a database, officials say, there is inconsistent questioning between police departments.

For example, if police allege that a crime is committed with a handgun, Schwartz said he would expect officers to ask whether the suspect has a permit. Ireland, on the other hand, said that would not be part of a normal line of questioning.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at OnlineSentinel.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)