Tuesday, June 18, 2013
By Michael Shepherd email@example.com
State House Bureau
AUGUSTA — Maine State Police believe that a toy drone they bought in January would be a "great reconnaissance tool," according to internal records.
In this Feb. 26, 2013 file photo, Christopher Taylor, president and drone designer for Viking Unmanned Aerial Systems of Limington, talks about his company's FR-Xtreme model that is on the table at the State House in Augusta. Maine State Police believe a toy drone the agency purchased in January would be a “great reconnaissance tool,” according to internal agency records, but federal reulations suggest it would be illegal for police to use it.
Staff photo by Joe Phelan
But federal regulations suggest it would be illegal for police to deploy it.
Documents published Friday by MuckRock, an open-government website, show that Sgt. Nicholas Grass of the Maine State Police's training troop purchased a Parrot AR.Drone 2.0 for $299.99 and an extra battery for $39.99, costing the state $364.93 after shipping.
Among the documents is a heavily redacted memo that lists the drone's pros and cons. The pros include its "ability to record while flying and take still photos, which get downloaded to the attached thumb drive – great reconnaissance tool."
Also, the memo says, the drone helps the "safety of team members." It's also "cheap," and if "it gets broken or damaged," the force can get a new one or fix it.
The device's drawbacks include the fact that it offers a mere 15 minutes of flying time on one battery, with batteries taking an hour to recharge. The memo also says wind affects the drone, so heavy winds could keep it from flying.
Another negative: "It's a 'toy,' which probably wasn't made to be used for Tactical missions (to that I say, 'why not?')," the memo reads.
MuckRock obtained the documents through a Freedom of Access request to state police.
Federal Aviation Administration guidelines say hobbyists can fly small, unmanned airplanes below an altitude of 400 feet without its approval. But if a craft is owned by a public agency, federal credentials must be provided, according to the FAA's website.
Maine State Police spokesman Stephen McCausland said he wasn't aware of any legal issues with the state flying the drone below 400 feet.
"We obviously will abide by any federal regulations and we will easily clarify that next week," he said in an interview Friday.
The Portland Press Herald first reported the drone's purchase on Tuesday, when a committee of the Maine Legislature held a public hearing on a bill sponsored by Sen. John Patrick, D-Rumford, that would require police to get warrants in most cases before using drones.
Lt. Col. Raymond Bessette, deputy chief of the state police, said Tuesday that the drone was purchased out of "curiosity" and will be used for training purposes until the department learns how it can be deployed.
"We definitely would not want to deploy anything without a clear policy direction," he said.
Shenna Bellows, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Maine, whose national organization is leading a campaign in many states to tamp down use of drones, said Friday that the state's acquisition of a drone highlights a need to regulate them quickly.
"We know that drones are being used by hobbyists and for commercial purposes, so the Maine State Police having a drone isn't alarming in and of itself," she said. "But the complete absence of safeguards on their use is alarming."
Bellows said the "reconnaissance" language in the state police memo is concerning. McCausland said he didn't know who wrote the pros-and-cons memo in the document.
Calls to Bessette and Grass, who bought the drone, weren't returned Friday. According to Parrot's website, the AR.Drone 2.0 can record high-definition video, be controlled from as far as 165 feet away and be controlled by tilts from a smartphone or a tablet.
"Clearly, the state police are interested in reconnaissance, which is surveillance," Bellows said. "Mainers shouldn't have to fear that drones are hovering over their backyard for no reason."
But McCausland said reconnaissance isn't necessarily surveillance as many think of it – it could mean searching for a missing person or getting a point of view on a hostage situation – if it's determined that police can use drones.
Michael Shepherd can be contacted at 370-7652 or at: