January 11

Maine whistleblower: Boss ordered shredding of documents

The former state official says the order was prompted by a newspaper's impending request for records on how grant funds had been reallocated.

By Eric Russell erussell@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

AUGUSTA — A former Maine Department of Health and Human Services employee told lawmakers Friday that her boss ordered her to destroy public records because a newspaper planned to request them under the Freedom of Access Act.

click image to enlarge

Former Center for Disease Control official Sharon Leahy-Lind filed suit under the Whistleblower Protection Act.

Eric Russell/Staff Writer

Related headlines

Sharon Leahy-Lind, who was director of local public health for the state Center for Disease Control and Prevention, stepped down from her job in July and filed a federal lawsuit in October under the Whistleblower Protection Act.

She testified before the Legislature’s Government Oversight Committee on Friday during a public hearing on a report released last month that was highly critical of the CDC for its role in the alleged document shredding.

Committee members deferred action on the report by the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability until their next meeting, on Jan. 24, but talked at length about what the state’s responsibility is to keep certain records and whether those responsibilities are being met.

“There is not much use to have a (public access) law if we can’t enforce it, and the CDC is not the only agency out of compliance recently,” said Sen. Margaret Craven, D-Lewiston, referring to the LePage administration’s recent refusal to release a consultant’s report on the impact of Medicaid expansion despite repeated requests by media outlets.

Beth Ashcroft, director of the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability, said there is no evidence that documents were shredded, only that they were not retained. That applies to both paper copies and electronic copies of documents, she said.

The incident came to light early last year. Its origin was a funding cut to the Healthy Maine Partnership program, from $7.5 million in 2012 to $4.7 million in 2013.

To redistribute funds accordingly, CDC officials hastily reworked the award process. They began facing questions after awards were slashed in more populated regions and increased in rural districts.

The grants fund health initiatives, including smoking cessation and fitness programs, that often are used and praised by employers and health advocates. The money is distributed primarily through the Fund for a Healthy Maine, which has had severe budget cuts over the past three years.

The shift in funds prompted the Sun Journal of Lewiston to ask state officials about the process. At that point, Leahy-Lind said, she was told by supervisors to shred documents.

She did not identify her supervisor in her testimony Friday, but in the federal lawsuit she filed in October, she said that CDC Deputy Director Christine Zukas “physically assaulted and ordered her to take the documents home and destroy them there.”

On Friday, Leahy-Lind said the way she was treated by her bosses during the incident was “the antithesis of the department I had worked for for 12 years.”

CDC officials later created documents to satisfy the Sun Journal’s public records request.

The report released last month was critical of the CDC but offered a number of recommendations, including:

Gathering better performance data, rather than relying on subjective information.

Ensuring the integrity of future processes for awarding grants under the Healthy Maine Partnership Program.

Offering better guidance and clarification to employees about the agency’s policy for document retention.

William Boeschenstein, chief operating officer of the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, acknowledged Friday that the incident highlighted weaknesses in the agency and said his office has taken steps to ensure that documents are properly handled and retained.

During the investigation, unnamed officials in the CDC told investigators that they believed the documents were “working papers,” rather than final documents, so they were not public records.

Some lawmakers, including Craven, said employees in the CDC should be held accountable for what happened.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at OnlineSentinel.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)