May 1, 2013

Plan to reform state tax structure meets with lukewarm response, criticism

By Michael Shepherd
State House Bureau

AUGUSTA — A bipartisan plan unveiled Wednesday that would overhaul Maine’s tax structure met with a lukewarm response from top politicians, as well as criticism from interest groups who stand to win or lose from the proposed income and sales tax changes.

The plan by the so-called “Gang of 11,” introduced at a State House news conference, would impose a flat income tax rate of 4 percent, replacing a scale that now has a top rate of 7.95 percent. It would also increase the sales tax from 5 percent to 6 percent and eliminate most of the 87 current sales tax exemptions — except for those related to health care and education.

That would yield an estimated $700 million in additional revenue, and after tax cuts, bring in $160 million more in revenue than proposed in Gov. Paul LePage’s current budget, supporters say.

“This is huge,” said Rep. L. Gary Knight, a Republican from Livermore Falls who will be the chief sponsor of the bill that contains the plan. “Polarization and gridlock have hampered Washington, but not us and not this time.”

The response from leading lawmakers was tepid, however.

Senate President Justin Alfond, D-Portland, said he hasn’t seen the plan.

House Minority Leader Kenneth Fredette, R-Newport, said the plan was an amplified version of a tax reform proposal that voters rejected in 2010, and it won’t find widespread support in his caucus.

Richard Rosen, director of Gov. Paul LePage’s policy office, said LePage is “withholding judgment” on the plan until he sees more concrete details.

The lawmakers who crafted the proposal come from across the political spectrum and are led by Sen. Dick Woodbury, a Yarmouth independent and Harvard University-trained economist.

Republicans involved include Assistant Senate Majority Leader Roger Katz, of Augusta, who said he expected interest groups will be out in force to pick away at the plan.

“If this kind of reform were easy, it would have happened years ago,” Katz said.

Reactions to the plan started to emerge from certain groups. The conservative National Federation of Independent Business called it “encouraging but incomplete.” The group praised the income tax cuts but said the sales tax increase — from 5 percent to 6 percent — would offset the positive effect.
Liberals will be rankled by the proposal’s corporate income-tax cut — from nearly 9 percent to 7.5 percent — and elimination of the state estate tax.

Senate Majority Leader Seth Goodall, D-Richmond, said he didn’t particularly like those two parts of the plan. Fredette called the increase in sales tax regressive, hitting the poor hardest.

However, sponsors said the proposal would reduce Maine’s reliance on property taxes significantly.

According to the Tax Foundation, property taxes made up nearly 41 percent of Maine’s state and local tax revenue in 2010, up from slightly more than 36 percent in 2008.

“You’ve got to look at everything as an entire picture,” Goodall said. “This sets Maine on a path for greater stability for our budget process. It also provides relief for property tax, which is long overdue.”

One major provision would increase Maine’s homestead property-tax exemption from $10,000 to $50,000, meaning that amount would be shielded from property-tax payment. The group said a majority of resident taxpayers will see property tax reductions of more than $500.

“If that’s not an economic stimulus package for our state, I don’t know what is,” Katz said.

Fredette, the Republican House leader, said the plan is unlikely to win much support from his party. He described the proposal as a more ambitious version of tax reform rejected in 2010.

“We are generally, I think, opposed to the idea of taxing everything including food, raising the lodging tax and the meals tax in a bill that, frankly, raises revenues for the state,” he said. “We’ll let this thing play itself out, but as a Republican leader, it’s not something we’d generally look favorably on.”

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)