August 4, 2012

Budget cuts hit Head Start programs

Educare Central Maine, with a $210,000 funding loss, makes reductions

By Ben McCanna
Staff Writer

WATERVILLE -- While Gov. Paul LePage made headlines last month blasting the state's education system, a local Head Start program -- and others statewide -- continued to grapple with budget cuts made by the Legislature.

click image to enlarge

Carter Nichols eats his lunch while at Head Start at Educare Central Maine in Waterville on Friday.

Staff photo by Michael G. Seamans

click image to enlarge

Monica Pollard reads a story to Landon Dwelley, 1, before nap time at Head Start at Educare Central Maine in Waterville on Friday.

Staff photo by Michael G. Seamans

At Educare Central Maine on Drummond Avenue, administrators closed one class and eliminated four jobs because of the funding cuts. At other Head Start programs around the state, 25 people could lose their jobs and about 200 at-risk children lost the opportunity to attend early-education schools, according to analysts.

"It's scary," said Laurie LaChance, chairwoman of Educare Central Maine. "I understand what happens at the budget level, and I understand the tough choices; but any time we take even a small step backward, it's a step in the wrong direction."

In May, the Legislature reduced funding for Head Start by $2 million. At Educare, which serves about 220 children ages 0 to 5, the cut translates to a loss of $210,000, according to the school's director, Kathryn Colfer. The cuts come from two directions, Colfer said. The school will receive $150,000 less from the state in direct funding, and families who are enrolled in the program will receive less tuition assistance from the state, roughly $60,000. The program also has lost $77,000 in federal money now that the American Rehabilitation and Recovery Act has ended, she said.

As a result of the $287,000 loss, Educare eliminated three teaching positions and an administrative position and closed one of its full-day, full-year classes that served eight infants and toddlers, its most staff-intensive and expensive program.

"We didn't kick anybody out of the program," Colfer said of the class closure. "We did it through attrition. It just means that there are eight fewer opportunities for enrollment."

Head Start is a federal program that provides education to children, ages 0 to 5 years old, and child care for their families, primarily those living in poverty. The majority of Head Start funding is paid by the federal government directly to qualified schools, but Maine provides additional support, Colfer said.

Head Start programs in Maine have the capacity to serve fewer than 30 percent of Maine's income-eligible children, according to data from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. In 2010, there were 18,000 children between 0 to 5 living in poverty in Maine, which is 22 percent of all Maine children in that age group.

Ed Cervone is interim president of the Maine Development Foundation, a group that strives to improve long-term, sustainable economic development for Maine. Cervone said Head Start programs have the power to end the cycle of poverty in Maine by focusing on its youngest children.

"That's their foundation for success or failure," Cervone said of the 0-to-5 age range. "Poverty is a huge, toxic stress to a family and a kid. If a kid is already coming into the world into poverty, there's already one strike against them -- one more hurdle for them to get to success. Programs like Head Start are valuable, proven, and have good effects for Maine kids."

Judy Reidt-Parker, an early-childhood policy analyst for the Maine Children's Alliance, said studies show that the return on investment for Head Start programs is higher than the funding of older age groups or children in different economic circumstances.

"The thing that makes Head Start special is it's targeted at a specific at-risk population. You get a return of $7 for every $1 invested," she said. "These studies have been going on for 35 to 40 years, and the returns are pretty evident now."

The $1-to-$7 cost-benefit ratio is touted by the National Head Start Association website, which cites three scientific studies as sources. Two of the studies, published by the Social Policy Report and the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, make no mention of a specific ratio in regard to Head Start, but both conclude Head Start could be as effective or more effective than a $1-to-$7 cost-benefit ratio at a similar preschool program, the High/Scope Perry Preschool.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)