BY CLARKE CANFIELD
PORTLAND -- Maine's highest court on Thursday upheld a state law that aims to hasten the permit process for wind farms in the state.
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court unanimously rejected arguments from the Friends of Lincoln Lakes nonprofit group, which challenged the Department of Environmental Protection's approval of a 40-turbine wind power project on Rollins Mountain in northern Penobscot County.
The group contended regulators moved too quickly and failed to consider fully the effect that project would have on people and wildlife. Evergreen Wind Power III LLC, a subsidiary of First Wind, is proposing to build a 60-megawatt wind farm with turbines that are 389 feet high.
Friends of Lincoln Lakes further claimed that Maine's Wind Power Act is unconstitutional because it streamlines the permitting and appeals process for wind power projects in specified areas of the state. The law is part of the state's long-term strategy to install more than 2,000 megawatts of wind capacity by 2015 and 3,000 megawatts by 2020.
However, justices ruled that the law's provisions are "rationally related to a legitimate state interest" and don't violate the U.S. or Maine Constitution.
"Though not required to do so, the Legislature has articulated a legitimate state interest in facilitating the rapid development of alternative, renewable energy sources," Justice Donald Alexander wrote in the 19-page decision.
Lynne Williams, a Bar Harbor attorney who represented Friends of Lincoln Lakes, wasn't surprised by the decision, but said it was important to appeal the case as part of the "struggle against these industrial wind companies that are colonizing our rural communities."
"I think it's important that we not just roll over and let these companies come into our towns and take over," she said.
Sean Mahoney, an attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation, said that while the law has accelerated the permitting process, it hasn't lessened the level of scrutiny to which wind farm applicants are subjected. The CLF joined the lawsuit in support of the law.
"Our argument was that the state has a legitimate interest in developing renewable energy resources in order to address economic issues, as far as cost of heating and the cost of electricity, and address environmental issues, primarily climate change issues," he said. "We would say it's not only legitimate, but that it's compelling."
First Wind, based in Boston, hopes to begin construction on the project this summer, spokesman John Lamontagne said.
Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form
3 COMMENTS
TTesseo said...
Our argument was that the state has a legitimate interest in developing renewable energy resources in order to address economic issues, as far as cost of heating and the cost of electricity, and address environmental issues, primarily climate change issues," he said. "We would say it's not only legitimate, but that it's compelling." What a bunch of bull.Tis is what we're up against.Quite sad really
March 12, 2010 at 7:12 AM Report abuse
stillstandin said...
Is there a seperate rule of justice for the government and those governed??????????????? The justices ruled that the law's provisions are "rationally related to a legitimate state interest", though the Legislature is not required to do so. Well, the legislature is and should be required to fully consider the effects these laws have on the people. The states interest may be legitimate. But, it is the effects that are compelling.
March 12, 2010 at 11:44 AM Report abuse
ThomasPaine said...
Corporate interests put these officials into office, it only stands to reason that they'll rule in favor of those who helped put them there. It's just as Frederic Bastiat once said, "When plunder has become a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it."
March 12, 2010 at 4:18 PM Report abuse