Clear

High: 83°

Low: 65°

Sunrise

6:03 AM

Sunset

7:11 PM



August 1

School reform hinges on election

By Matthew Stone mstone@centralmaine.com
Staff Writer

It's either a 200-page document that details a solid foundation for an education-reform agenda. Or it's a document with a vision that needs to be abandoned or revamped with new policies.

With Maine out of the running for an award in the federal Race to the Top education-reform competition, the questions are starting about what becomes of the Pine Tree State's 211-page entry into the competition.

State education officials say they plan to charge ahead with reforms outlined in the application -- even though Maine came up empty-handed in the competition's second round, which attracted applications from 35 states and Washington, D.C.

But how far some of the reforms get depends in part on who's elected governor in November.

Maine's application proposed what the state Department of Education called a system of "personalized learning" that allows students to pursue high school degrees by mastering course materials at their own pace.

The document also mentioned plans to expand the Maine Learning Technology Initiative and Jobs for Maine's Graduates programs.

The technology initiative provides middle school and most high school students with laptops. Jobs for Maine's Graduates is a nonprofit program in more than 60 schools that targets students at risk of not finishing high school.

"We're going to continue pushing these various initiatives as we have, and they're going to expand as they have," said David Connerty-Marin, a Maine Department of Education spokesman. "Obviously, if we had $75 million extra, we would be able to accelerate that expansion."

More districts are starting to adopt personalized learning, or standards-based education, on their own, Connerty-Marin noted, and the state was able to carry out a laptop initiative expansion to more than half of high schools a year ago without an influx of funds.

Jobs for Maine's Graduates President Craig Larrabee said in June the organization is at work soliciting private funds to bankroll programs in more schools.

There are parts of Maine's Race to the Top application worth pushing forward, said Steve Bowen, who reviewed and blogged about the application for the Maine Heritage Policy Center.

But "you have the Baldacci administration crafting the reform agenda for the next governor," he said. "The next step is to pay attention to the governor's race."

For independent candidate Eliot Cutler, there's not much to work with in Maine's Race to the Top application until the state makes some key policy changes in line with the competition's reform objectives.

"Until we make real changes and really open the system in Maine to reform and innovation," he said, "I think we are going to continue to be also-rans both in terms of competition for Race to the Top funds, but also in the performance of our schools."

Maine needs to allow charter schools, Cutler said, and the state needs to make a genuine effort to start evaluating teachers based on the achievement of their students.

"We need to give good teachers an opportunity to teach and to innovate and excel," he said. "We've put our good teachers in strait jackets."

Republican candidate Paul LePage, the only candidate who wouldn't offer an interview for this article, said in a statement released by his campaign that education policy is best left up to local school boards.

"The Race to the Top funding is not about educating kids, it is about the federal government running the education system," the statement said. "We need to be careful about accepting federal money with strings attached."

Democratic nominee Libby Mitchell praised Maine's Race to the Top proposal to customize learning for each student. The state's Race to the Top application was also sensitive to teachers' union concerns about basing teacher evaluations and pay on student performance, she said.

The application highlighted recently passed legislation allowing so-called innovative schools in Maine, rather than charter schools, which legislators have repeatedly opposed.

"The Department of Education did a lot of work to make sure the application was a good one, while respecting our concerns," she said. "To have that vision statement is going to be a good blueprint for policymakers."

If funding for a third round of Race to the Top survives the federal budget process, independendent candidate Shawn Moody said he'd be interested in applying for it, as governor.

"We need that funding to help us improve our lowest-performing schools," he said. "We need that funding to help us implement a merit-pay system."

The performance-based teacher pay system Moody proposes differs from the methods favored by the Obama administration, which base teacher evaluations in part on students' academic performance.

Moody recommends an annual evaluation that incorporates feedback from the principal, a teacher peer group and parents.

"It's a lot of positives that come out of that comprehensive process," he said.

Independent candidate Kevin Scott praised Department of Education employees for the work they put into Maine's Race to the Top application.

The document's vision, however, doesn't match Scott's. He calls for a larger role for private schools in Maine's public education system. The state's private schools and universities, he said, should serve as the bodies that authorize charter schools.

While Maine missed out on Race to the Top money, Scott said, that's not such a bad outcome.

"We dodged another set of federally determined mandates," he said. "I believe that, now, Maine educators and Maine parents and Maine children have breathing room to work on Maine-based educational improvements."

Editor's note: The candidates' platforms were presented in alphabetical order by last name for this article.

Matthew Stone -- 623-3811, ext. 435

mstone@centralmaine.com

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher

8 COMMENTS

GW said...

Any program that does not consider the performance of the students is doomed to failure. That would be like rating Doctors on how well they broke the news that the patient died on the table. We need to go back to basics. No wonder there are no Federal forthcoming.

August 1, 2010 at 5:43 AM Report abuse

MeMissU said...

Laptops wont change a thing without public transportation and an Employment Office. Those are the things that encourage a student to do well. A chance for employment, and the ways & means to get there. If you can't get a job and no way to get there if you do, you'll be stuck at-home on your laptop and have to beg for Welfare to survive. Put buses back on the streets, provide an Employment Office to match people to jobs, and everything else will fall into place simply, and naturally. Otherwise, nothing will change. Basic needs come first. Then, you get a laptop!

August 1, 2010 at 7:35 AM Report abuse

wasup said...

"personalized learning" that allows students to pursue high school degrees by mastering course materials at their own pace. Maybe it's just me but this sound like educational welfare. Are we really going to change arund the deck chairs to accomodate kids who refuse to get off their butt. Those poor misunderstood children, ha! back it the day the answer was to conform not a pat on the head and an offically prepared excuse.

August 1, 2010 at 7:47 AM Report abuse

Govt2Big said...

Mr. LePage has the best plan to resolve our educational issues. One of the largest problems with our educations system seems to fall directly on the leadership. To be specific, both the MEA and NEA have gone very political in support of the Far-Left agenda. Just imagine what could be done for improvements if they just focused on education versus the Far-Left’s agenda. In fact, just take a few minutes and review the major 2009 contributions for the PAC called “Citizens Unified for Maine's Future” posted at http://www.mainecampaignfinance.com/Public/entity_financial_transactions.asp?TYPE=PAC&ID=4499 ***Follow-the-Money and you will find the true problem.

August 1, 2010 at 7:50 AM Report abuse

mdenis46 said...

LePage - "The Race to the Top funding is not about educating kids, it is about the federal government running the education system..." Well I have to agree with him there! --- Govt2Big, once again, it's all the big, bad unions. Would you be happy with no unions and schools pushing the far right-wing agenda?

August 1, 2010 at 8:29 AM Report abuse

napper said...

Mr LiePage wants to abolish the Department of Education...How in God's Creation (quote from LiePage) how is that going to help educate young Maine students? By teaching them Creationism instead of science. Last time I read the constitution there was a separation of church and state. Al this from a guy who carries the constitution around with him...maybe he ought to read the damn thing before he spouts off anymore BS garbage

August 1, 2010 at 8:39 AM Report abuse

HoHum said...

Napper if the constitution wants seperation of church and state then why are there so many gay marriage issues...if that is your argument then we should never have another referendum...thank you

August 1, 2010 at 9:02 AM Report abuse

pstonge said...

Who is the "our" referring to in Libby's quote? Has she been fully consumed by the MEA? What price did she pay for their endorsement? Was it her soul (or what is left of a soul) that hasn't been sold to others)? If you like the status quo and the are not bothered by the trends of the last 30 years in education, by all means, vote for Libby. However, if you are worried about the direction our school systems are headed in, you would be wise to consider LePage or Cutler.

August 1, 2010 at 8:32 PM Report abuse