February 5, 2013

Maine AG wants hospitals to allow public into meetings

The boards of those that rely mostly on taxpayer funding should be more open to scrutiny, the attorney general says.

By Steve Mistler smistler@pressherald.com
State House Bureau

The past two Legislatures have reviewed – and defeated – proposals to make the board meetings of the state's hospitals subject to Maine's right-to-know law. This year the state's top lawyer is upping the ante with a bill that would require some hospitals that receive public funding to hold public meetings.

click image to enlarge

State Attorney General Janet Mills

Staff photo by Andy Molloy

Attorney General Janet Mills said Monday that she's drafting legislation that would affect hospitals that receive 50 percent or more of their operating revenues from state and federal funding.

The measure would allow the public to attend board deliberations at those hospitals on issues such as capital expansion projects and purchases that could affect host communities and taxpayers.

Mills' bill, which has not yet been printed, arrives as state lawmakers and Gov. Paul LePage prepare for deliberations on the budget and the governor's proposal to pay $484 million in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements owed to hospitals by the state.

The debt payoff plan is politically charged. Democratic lawmakers agree that the state should reimburse the hospitals, but they are uneasy about the governor's apparent coziness with the Maine Hospital Association, the influential organization representing the state's 39 hospitals, 34 of which are nonprofits.

Mills, a Democrat, said Monday that her proposal isn't politically motivated. She said hospitals that receive significant public funding should conduct business that affects their host communities in the light of day.

"They make decisions every month that affect our communities and affect our state," Mills said. "They make decisions about whether to build large buildings. They make decisions about whether to take our tax dollars and buy large pieces of equipment. Some of those decisions are reviewed by public entities, some are not.

"The decisions affect thousands of employees and hundreds if not thousands of businesses who receive services from these hospitals and who negotiate with hospitals," Mills said.

According to statistics from the Maine Department of Labor, 11 hospitals are among the state's top 30 employers and four are in the top 10.

Previous proposals to include hospitals in the state's Freedom of Access Act have failed amid opposition from the Maine Hospital Association. These include a 2011 bill by Rep. Adam Goode, D-Bangor, that would have originally subjected hospitals receiving $250,000 in state or federal funds to the state's open-records law. That measure would have affected all of Maine's hospitals.

Goode later proposed raising the public funding threshold to $1 million and simply making board meetings public. The bill was unanimously rejected by the Legislature's Health and Human Services Committee.

The committee based part of its decision on a 2008 opinion by the state's Right to Know Advisory Committee. The panel, which reviews changes to the open-records law, worried that the bill would eventually affect all nonprofits, which are essentially private entities. According to committee minutes, some members believed that a proposal could be tailored to nonprofits that "perform a public function" -- such as hospitals -- but no proposal emerged.

Mills said her proposal will only target hospitals. She said the open-records requirement would not apply to proprietary, personnel or patient information. Such matters, she said, could be discussed in private session, just as public entities do now.

It's not yet clear how many hospitals would be affected under her proposed funding trigger.

Most hospitals receive federal and state funds through Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement. The reimbursement is also the source of Maine's current debt to hospitals.

In 2011, the hospital association described Goode's bill as a "slap-back proposal" -- retribution against its members for publicly challenging lawmakers to settle the state's debt.

Jeffrey Austin, a lobbyist for the hospital association, declined to characterize Mills' proposal without first discussing it with her. However, he said, his group would likely oppose a bill that treats hospitals differently than other private entities.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at OnlineSentinel.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


More PPH Blogs